MDPM Complex Data Ingestion – MDPM vs Azure Synapse vs Power Apps|Data Flow

 MDPM vs Azure Synapse - Complex Ingestion Showdown
🏆 MDPM vs Azure Synapse – Complex Ingestion Showdown

🏆 MDPM vs Azure Synapse vs Power Apps vs Dataflows

Ultimate Data Ingestion Showdown: 5 Industry Scenarios

🎯 THE CHALLENGE

Can MDPM outperform Azure Synapse, Power Apps, and Dataflows in complex, real-world data ingestion scenarios?

Spoiler: YES! And we’ll prove it across 5 industries with detailed comparisons.

🆚 Technology Overview

Azure Synapse Analytics

Type: Enterprise Data Warehouse

Best For: Petabyte-scale analytics, complex transformations

Pricing: $$$$ (High)

Complex Pipelines Big Data Enterprise

Power Apps + Power Automate

Type: Low-code App Platform

Best For: Simple forms, basic workflows

Pricing: $$ (Medium)

Low-code Forms Simple Flows

Power Platform Dataflows

Type: ETL Service

Best For: Scheduled data refreshes, simple transformations

Pricing: $$$ (Medium-High)

Scheduled Basic ETL Cloud Only

MDPM

Type: Desktop Data Management Tool

Best For: Complex ingestion, lookups, real-time sync

Pricing: $ (Low – one-time)

Desktop Complex Real-time

📊 Comparison Criteria

Metric Azure Synapse Power Apps Dataflows MDPM
Time to Production Months Weeks Days-Weeks Days ✅
Complex Data Relationships ✅ (with complex coding) ❌ (Simple only) ⚠️ (Limited) ✅ (GUI + auto)
Real-time Capability ⚠️ (15-30 min delay) ❌ (Polling only) ❌ (Scheduled only) ✅ (<5 min)
Data Volume Handling ✅ (Unlimited) ❌ (<1M records) ⚠️ (<10M records) ✅ (Billion+)
Lookup Relationships ✅ (Manual SQL) ⚠️ (Simple lookups) ⚠️ (Basic) ✅ (Wizard + auto)
Cost Efficiency ❌ (Very high) ⚠️ (Medium) ⚠️ (Medium-high) ✅ (Lowest)
Skill Level Required Expert (Azure, SQL, .NET) Beginner (Low-code) Intermediate Beginner+ ✅
Error Handling ✅ (Complex setup) ❌ (Basic) ⚠️ (Limited) ✅ (Built-in)
🥊 SCENARIO 1 🥊

🏥 HEALTHCARE: Multi-Source Patient Data Aggregation

The Business Problem

Hospital Network Challenge: 15 hospitals, each with different EMR systems (Epic, Cerner, Meditech), need to aggregate patient data into a central Dataverse for analytics.

Data Complexity:

  • 📊 50 million patient records
  • 🔗 12 lookup tables with complex hierarchies
  • 🌐 15 different source APIs
  • ⚠️ HIPAA compliance required

🟣 Power Apps + Power Automate Approach

Limitations & Challenges:

  • ❌ API Limits: Power Automate has 100K API calls/month limit on standard plans
  • ❌ Data Volume: Can’t handle 50M records – would require 500+ separate flows
  • ❌ Complex Lookups: 12 lookup tables would require nested Apply to Each loops
  • ❌ Performance: Each lookup adds 1-2 seconds – 12 lookups = 24+ seconds/record
  • ❌ Error Handling: Basic retry logic only, no checkpoint/resume capability

Implementation Attempt:

Power Automate Flow for ONE hospital: 1. When HTTP request is received (webhook from EMR) 2. Parse JSON (patient data) 3. Apply to Each (process each record): a. Lookup Provider (by NPI) → Get provider GUID b. Lookup Facility (by code) → Get facility GUID c. Lookup Diagnosis (ICD-10) → Get diagnosis GUID d. … repeat for 9 more lookups e. Create Patient Record with all GUIDs PROBLEMS: – 50M records × 12 lookups = 600M Dataverse calls – At 100 calls/minute limit = 6000 minutes = 100 hours – Actually: 100 hours × 15 hospitals = 1500 hours = 62.5 days – Cost: Premium connectors required = $15/user/month × 10 users = $150/month – Plus: $0.60 per 1000 operations = $30,000 for 50M operations IMPOSSIBLE TO COMPLETE!

Timeline & Cost:

MetricPower Apps
Time to Production❌ Impossible
Maximum Records< 1M (due to limits)
Annual Cost$30,000+ (just for operations)
Team Size3 FTE (constantly maintaining flows)

💖 Power Platform Dataflows Approach

Limitations & Challenges:

  • ❌ API Sources: Limited connector support for healthcare APIs
  • ❌ Complex Transformations: Can’t handle hierarchical lookups easily
  • ❌ Data Volume: 50M records exceeds memory limits
  • ❌ Real-time: Minimum refresh interval is 1 hour
  • ❌ Error Recovery: No checkpoint capability – fails entire batch

Implementation Attempt:

Dataflow Design for ONE hospital: Entities: 1. Source: REST API (EMR system) 2. Transform: Map fields (simple mapping only) 3. Lookup: Provider table (1 lookup max for performance) 4. Output: Dataverse PROBLEMS: – Can only do 1-2 lookups before performance degrades – 12 lookups would require 12 separate dataflows chained together – Each dataflow refresh = full reload (no incremental) – 50M records would timeout (2 hour limit) – Memory limits: ~500K records per run – Would need 100 runs × 15 hospitals = 1500 runs – Scheduling nightmare!

Timeline & Cost:

MetricDataflows
Time to Production8-12 weeks (if possible)
Maximum Records< 10M (with workarounds)
Annual Cost$24,000 (Premium capacity)
Team Size2 FTE

🔷 Azure Synapse Approach

Summary:

MetricAzure Synapse
Time to Production16 weeks (4 months)
Lines of Code69,000 lines
Team Size5.5 FTE
Annual Cost$817,400

🟢 MDPM Approach

Summary:

MetricMDPM
Time to Production9.5 days (~2 weeks)
Lines of Code3,000 lines (95% generated)
Team Size1.5 FTE
Annual Cost$168,000

🏆 SCENARIO 1 COMPARISON

Technology Feasibility Time to Production Annual Cost Data Volume Limit Winner
Power Apps ❌ Impossible N/A $30,000+ < 1M records ❌
Dataflows ⚠️ Limited 8-12 weeks $24,000 < 10M records ❌
Azure Synapse ✅ Possible 16 weeks $817,400 Unlimited ⚠️
MDPM ✅ Excellent 9.5 days $168,000 Billion+ ✅ WINNER
🥊 SCENARIO 2 🥊

🏦 FINANCIAL SERVICES: Real-time Regulatory Compliance

Technology Capabilities Comparison

Real-time Requirements:

  • Azure Synapse: Stream Analytics possible but complex, T+15 minutes typical
  • Power Apps: Polling only (minimum 1 minute), not true real-time
  • Dataflows: Minimum 1 hour refresh, not real-time
  • MDPM: True real-time with Python scripts, T+5 minutes achievable

Volume Handling:

  • ✅ 2B transactions/year – possible with scaling
  • ❌ 2B transactions – impossible (API limits)
  • ❌ 2B transactions – exceeds capacity limits
  • ✅ 2B transactions – batch processing with checkpoints

🟣 Power Apps Limitations for Financial Data

Critical Failures:

  1. API Rate Limiting: Financial systems need high-frequency updates
  2. Data Loss Risk: No durable messaging or guaranteed delivery
  3. Audit Trail: Basic logging insufficient for regulatory compliance
  4. Data Validation: Limited validation capabilities for financial data
  5. Performance: 300+ fields per transaction would timeout

💖 Dataflows Limitations for Financial Data

Critical Failures:

  1. Latency: 1+ hour delay violates T+15 minute requirements
  2. Complex Transformations: Can’t handle currency conversions across 50 sources
  3. Error Recovery: No transaction rollback capability
  4. Scalability: Can’t process 2B records annually
  5. Cost: Premium capacity needed = $5,000/month minimum

SCENARIO 2 WINNER: MDPM

CapabilityPower AppsDataflowsSynapseMDPM
Real-time (T+15)❌ Fail❌ Fail⚠️ Possible✅ Excel
2B Records❌ Fail❌ Fail✅ Pass✅ Pass
Regulatory Audit❌ Fail⚠️ Limited✅ Pass✅ Pass
Cost Efficiency⚠️ Medium⚠️ Medium❌ Very High✅ Best
🥊 SCENARIO 3 🥊

🛒 RETAIL: Omnichannel Customer 360

Technology Feature Comparison

Power Apps

Customer 360 Attempt:

  • ✅ Simple customer forms
  • ❌ Can’t unify 100M customers
  • ❌ No deduplication across 7 sources
  • ❌ Performance degrades after 100K records
  • ⚠️ Basic dashboards only

Dataflows

Customer 360 Attempt:

  • ✅ Schedule data refreshes
  • ⚠️ Limited to 10M records total
  • ❌ No real-time sync
  • ⚠️ Complex joins difficult
  • ❌ No golden record creation

Azure Synapse

Customer 360 Attempt:

  • ✅ Can handle volume
  • ✅ Complex transformations
  • ⚠️ Real-time limited
  • ❌ High cost ($950K/year)
  • ❌ Complex implementation

MDPM

Customer 360 Solution:

  • ✅ 100M customers unified
  • ✅ AI-powered deduplication
  • ✅ Real-time sync
  • ✅ 16B+ events processed
  • ✅ Built-in dashboards

SCENARIO 3 WINNER: MDPM

Only MDPM can handle the scale (100M customers, 16B+ events) with real-time requirements

🎯 Key Differentiators Summary

Power Apps

Best For: Simple forms, basic CRUD

Not For: Complex ingestion, large volumes

Dataflows

Best For: Scheduled refreshes, simple ETL

Not For: Real-time, complex lookups

Azure Synapse

Best For: Enterprise DW, petabyte-scale

Not For: Cost-sensitive, rapid deployment

MDPM

Best For: Complex ingestion, lookups, real-time

Also For: Rapid deployment, cost efficiency

📊 FINAL COMPARISON TABLE

Feature Power Apps Dataflows Azure Synapse MDPM
Maximum Records 1M 10M Unlimited Billion+ ✅
Real-time Sync ❌ (Polling) ❌ (1hr min) ⚠️ (15-30 min) ✅ (<5 min)
Complex Lookups ❌ (Simple only) ⚠️ (Limited) ✅ (with coding) ✅ (Wizard + auto)
Cost for 50M records ❌ Impossible $24,000/yr $817,400/yr $168,000/yr ✅
Time to Production ❌ Impossible 8-12 weeks 16 weeks 2 weeks ✅
Team Required 3 FTE 2 FTE 5.5 FTE 1.5 FTE ✅
Error Recovery ❌ Basic ⚠️ Limited ✅ Complex ✅ Built-in
AI Assistance ❌ No ❌ No ❌ No ✅ Yes

🏆 MDPM WINS ACROSS ALL SCENARIOS 🏆

15x
Faster than Synapse
80%
Cheaper than Synapse
68%
Fewer people needed
✅
Possible vs Power Apps/Dataflows ❌

Only MDPM can handle complex, high-volume, real-time data ingestion across all 5 industry scenarios!

When to Choose Each Technology:

Power Apps:
• Simple forms
• Basic workflows
• <100K records
Dataflows:
• Scheduled refreshes
• Simple transformations
• <10M records
Azure Synapse:
• Petabyte analytics
• Complex data warehousing
• Unlimited budget
MDPM:
• Complex ingestion
• Real-time requirements
• Large volumes
• Cost sensitivity
Search
Shopping Cart